ANTERO POSTERIOR POSITION OF MAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISORS IN RELATION TO THE FOREHEAD IN PAKISTANI POPULATION

Authors

  • Mazhar Hussain Sharif Medical and Dental College Lahore
  • Faiza Malik Sharif Medical and Dental College Lahore
  • Muhammad Noman
  • Munawar Manzoor Ali
  • Gulsana Hashmi
  • Saba Sikandar

Keywords:

Anteroposterior, Forehead, Incisor, Orthodontics

Abstract

Abstract

Objective

To determine the anteroposterior (AP) position of maxillary central incisors in relation to the forehead and examine the potential correlation between the AP positioning of maxillary central incisors and the inclination of the forehead in a cohort representing the Pakistani population.

Materials and Methods

A total of 100 orthodontic patients aged 13 years and older, without regard to gender of Pakistani descent, were enrolled in the study. Exclusions comprised individuals with absent or impacted maxillary central incisors, history of orthodontic treatment, craniofacial trauma, prior cosmetic dental procedures, or anterior prostheses/restorations. Participants' demographic data including age and gender were recorded. Forehead inclination and position of maxillary central incisor were assessed from smiling photographs. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between the anteroposterior (AP) positioning of maxillary central incisors and the angle of forehead inclination. Differences in the AP positioning of maxillary central incisors based on age and gender were analyzed using t-tests and ANOVA.

Results

The males were 44 (44%) and females were 56 (56%). The mean age was 26.47 ± 6.46 years. The mean value of incisor position in males (2.86 ± 1.73 mm) was a little higher than in females (2.55 ± 2.03 mm) but not statistically significant (p = 0.416). The correlation between incisor position and forehead inclination was moderately high (r = 0.672), and it was very highly statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The average values for maxillary incisor sagittal position and forehead inclination were determined. A moderately strong and highly statistically significant correlation was observed between incisor position and forehead inclination. No gender differences were identified, although variations were noted among different age groups.

 Keywords: Anteroposterior; Forehead; Incisor; Orthodontics

Author Biographies

Faiza Malik, Sharif Medical and Dental College Lahore

Associate Professor in Orthodontics

Muhammad Noman

Senior Registrar in Orthodontics

Munawar Manzoor Ali

Assistant Professor in Orthodontics

Gulsana Hashmi

Senior Registrar in Orthodontics

Saba Sikandar

Saba.sikandar@hotmail.com

References

References

Cao L, Zhang K, Bai D, Jing Y, Tian Y, Guo Y. Effect of maxillary incisor labiolingual inclination and anteroposterior position on smiling profile esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(1):121-9.

Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103(4):299-312.

McKieman EX, McKiernan F, Jones ML. Psychological profiles and motives of adults seeking orthodontic treatment. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1992;7(3):187-98.

Andrews WA. AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white females. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(4):662-9.

Schlosser JB, Preston CB, Lampasso J. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(I):17-24.

Siddiqui AP, Nazir R, Mahmood A. Effect of sagittal position of maxilla and4 maxillary incisors inclination on the position of the upper lip. Pak Orthod J. 2017;9(1):8-14.

Carruitero MJ, Ambrosio Vallejos XM, Flores Mir C. glaellar vertical line as a reference goal for anteroposterior maxillary position. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019;24(3):1-4.

Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements: 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971;60(2):111-27.

Andrews LF, Andrews WA. The six elements of orofacial harmony. Andrews J Orthod Orofac Harmony 2000; 1:13-22.

He D, Gu Y, Sun Y. Evaluation of aesthetic anteroposterior position of maxillary incisors in patients with extraction treatment using facial reference lines. Int Med Res 2019;47(7):2951-60.

Rischen RJ, Breuning KH, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Records needed for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a systematic review. PLoS one. 2013;8(11):e74186.

Sarver DM. The importance of incisor position-ing in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120:98-111.

Schein SS, Trujillo LT, Langlois JH. Attractiveness bias: A cognitive explanation. Behav Brain Sci 2017;40: e43.

Melo AR, Conti ACCF, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Didier V, Valarelli DP, Capelozza Filho L. Evaluation of facial attractiveness in black people according to the subjective facial analysis criteria. Dental Press J Orthod 2017; 22:75-81.

Beall AE. Can a new smile make you look more intelligent and successful? Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51:289-97.

Yang IH, Nahm DS, Baek SH. Which hard and soft tissue factors relate with the amount of buccal corridor space during smiling? Angle Orthod. 2008; 78:5-11.

Maganzini AL, Schroetter SB, Freeman K. Improvement in smile esthetics following orthodontic treatment: A retrospective study utilizing standardized smile analysis. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84:492-9.

Kerns LL, Silveira AM, Kerns DG, Regennitter FJ. Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthet Dent 2007; 9:76-85.

Wang S, Li H, Zou B, Zhang W. A novel contour-based registration of lateral cephalogram and profile photograph. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2018; 63:9-23.

Vajaria R, BeGole E, Kusnoto B, Galang MT, Obrez A. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(4):647-52.

Patil HD, Nehete AB, Gulve ND, Shah KR, Aher SD. Evaluation of upper incisor position and its comparison with lip posture in orthodontically treated patients. J Dent Med Sci. 2018; 17:53-60.

Adams M, Andrews W, Tremont T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, et al. Anteroposterior relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white males. Orthod J. 2013;14(1):34-9.

Gidaly MP, Tremont T, Lin CP, Kau CH, Souccar NM. Optimal antero-posterior position of the maxillary central incisors and its relationship to the forehead in adult African American females. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(1):123-8.

Basamtabar M, Imani MM, Safari-Faramani R, Teimourian H, Ebrahimi S, Bahrampour E. Relationship of anteroposterior position of maxillary central incisors with the forehead in an adult Iranian subpopulation: A cross-sectional study. Int Orthod. 2021;19(3):480-6.

Resnick CM, Kim S, Yorlets RR, Calabrese CE, Peacock ZS, Kaban LB. Evaluation of andrews' analysis as a predictor of ideal sagittal maxillary positioning in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76:2169-76.

He D, Gu Y, Sun Y. Evaluation of aesthetic anteroposterior position of maxillary incisors in patients with extraction treatment using facial reference lines. J Int Med Res 2019; 47:2951-60.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-09

How to Cite

1.
Hussain M, Faiza Malik, Muhammad Noman, Munawar Manzoor Ali, Gulsana Hashmi, Saba Sikandar. ANTERO POSTERIOR POSITION OF MAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISORS IN RELATION TO THE FOREHEAD IN PAKISTANI POPULATION. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 9 [cited 2026 Jan. 11];37(3):286-90. Available from: https://www.ayubmed.edu.pk/jamc/index.php/jamc/article/view/13618